COVID-19 Fake Pandemic
By Bill Sikora
Last Updated: July 1, 2020
Check out this Article from the OffGuardian COVID-19 PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless. It was written by Torsten Engelbrecht and Konstantin Demeter.
Torsten Engelbrecht is an award-winning journalist and author from Hamburg, Germany. In 2006 he co-authored "Virus-Mania", I highly recommend the book, with Dr Klaus Kohnlein; and in 2009 he won the German Alternate Media Award. He has also written for Rubikon, Süddeutsche Zeitung, Financial Times Deutschland and many others.
Konstantin Demeter is a freelance photographer and an independent researcher. Together with Torsten Engelbrecht he has published articles on the “COVID-19” crisis in the online magazine Rubikon, as well as making contributions on the monetary system, geopolitics, and the media in Swiss and Italian newspapers.
There is a common assumption that since we are using the PCR test to determine the spread of the virus, that the test must be accurate. This article shows the fallacy of this assumption. Note the article refers to SARS-COV-2. SARS-COV-2 is the name of the virus. COVID-19 is the name of the illness caused by the virus.
Important points raised in the article include:
- Kary Mullis won the Nobel prize in chemistry for inventing the PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) test. He invented the test to replicate DNA sequences billions of times, and not as a diagnostic tool.
- The PCR test has never been verified as being accurate in identifying SARS-COV-2.
- The SARS-COV-2 virus has never been isolated. When a scientist extracts a virus from tissue, he wants to make sure he has only the virus and not other RNA. Without that you cannot test for the virus.
Here's a quote from the article:
... the authors of four of the principal, early 2020 papers claiming discovery of a new coronavirus concede they had no proof that the origin of the virus genome was viral-like particles or cellular debris, pure or impure, or particles of any kind. In other words, the existence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA is based on faith, not fact.
Dr Charles Calisher, an experienced virologist, was asked if SARS-COV-2 has been isolated and purified. His response was:
I know of no such a publication. I have kept an eye out for one.
Wang Chen, president of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, said in February that the PCR tests are:
...only 30 to 50 percent accurate.
Sin Hang Lee from the Milford Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory sent a letter to the WHO’s coronavirus response team and to Anthony S. Fauci on March 22, 2020, saying that:
It has been widely reported in the social media that the RT-qPCR [Reverse Transcriptase quantitative PCR] test kits used to detect SARSCoV-2 RNA in human specimens are generating many false positive results and are not sensitive enough to detect some real positive cases.
The article also talks about the PCR test having flip-flopping results of negative, positive, and dubious in the same patient when taken at different times. I can keep going on with other technical issues brought up which you can read if you want. But you get the idea. The test doesn't work, and yet we are using it to tally the number of COVID-19 cases we have. So what is going on here?
There are other medical reporters who have come to the conclusion that this COVID-19 test is worthless. Check out what they have to say:
- Jon Rappoport has been studying pandemics for over 30 years. You can read about his views on the PCR test here. I highly recommend his website NoMoreFakeNews
- This video is from the YouTube channel "Vax Not". In it Dr Andy Kaufman discusses why the PCR test doesn't work, plus other reasons there is no pandemic.
- This Zero Hedge report shows political reasons for a fake pandemic.